Play Wild Thornberrys Wildlife Rescue Game Online

text last night to the republic blogs

David the oath of the Jeu de Paume , 1791

What is the common point between a glass of Chilean red and one side of the Rhone? The two were brutally thrown on me last night, one at the beginning, the other at the end of the evening. A very nice christening for my first blog republic . Good thing I've always considered redder than most leftblogueurs.

When I arrived, Benoît Hamon responded to bloggers about Europe before the cameras and terrace fills. There was a crowd to participate in the Republic of blogs on the topic of European parliament elections. A quitter still missing, which I deeply regretted.

I went to greet Mathieu L . I note that he has on its register of appeal because it had reported to him that my coming. He introduced me to a famous blogger lawyer and I even saw the head of his liberal commentators, luck.

I had a clear idea in mind: to meet Olympian, missed it during the famous night She blogs ranking female, and CC I had seen from the list of bloggers attending the republic. This was done and I am delighted with my evening, especially as I met other friendly bloggers and bloggers like Pollux, the penguin and Jon, who reminded me to buy Chomsky, from the time I want to read it. We chatted with Ségolène Vogelsong, Mathieu and I tried to understand something of pearltree stethoscope and we jurors to see more closely this new utility "not helpful, but" after Vogelsong. It remains for me to understand now why he assured me that he had touitter. I just immerse myself and ... as long as you've opened a Facebook tab and another on your instant messaging, there's plenty of suffering cognitive overload. To put it another way: what it Twitter fair ...

The reputation of blogs, which gave me the opportunity yesterday to participate in interesting discussions, passionate yet relaxed, convinced me to return in the next edition. It's almost as though a Kremlin blogs, it said.


I'm still looking the few missing links to this post, if you can help me ... Some nicknames are very played on the net!

Motorcycle Swingarm Blueprint

Prof. untrained ... You said

Video found on the blog IUFM Paris on strike

graduate in contact geometry, without teacher training ...

Will Medicare And Medical Pay For Bathtubs

reform? In paleontology

Man Ray, Black and White , 1936

I listen to a radio a little lame but who deserves to spend the singers I like, dead for most. If one stops his ears to the chuckles of and facilitators for the "information", this station can be pleasant to listen.
Alas, I can bypass the flash "news" in the morning. They can not avoid talk of strikes, but we feel that it gives them a little. To relieve morning they diffused a heading "tricks" to avoid nasty protesters "yes because y'en fed up" (on the tone of "I'm still broke a nail"). Moving on.
I think the presenter (a journalist? "I dare believe it) has a single sentence to introduce every social movement, that copy-paste as needed. Students, researchers, teachers, workers, hospital staff, know that you fight all "against reform." Point. There you are "informed" ... We
extinguish his post roaring "but finally they accept anything, they want nothing moves or what!" if it was equipped with the IQ of Miss tips. Fortunately, I am equipped with a small Robert and I know my alphabet. So here we go:

"Reform: Improving scope in the moral or social development."

I ask the question: the government's plan for school, for example, is it reform?

Here is what the teacher thinks researcher Philip Meirieu (from his website )

"We know the key measures came from more than a year, to undermine the school French: new programs for primary school on the pretext of strengthening the" basic skills "are the student an "exercise machine" and deprive poor children access to the meaning of tasks and culture phasing out of school ... RASED that could provide students in big trouble adaptive aids during the removal of ... Saturday morning at the expense of balance of life for children ... establishment of systematic evaluations, teaching without justification, simply to provide indicators to parents reduced to the status of "clients" ... gradual disappearance of the school map with the promise that families can choose schools for their children when in reality it is the schools which select their pupils, thus widening inequalities ... abolition of Aid to artistic and cultural initiatives when they should, instead, strengthen to compensate for the idiocy of television and the fight against sideration by video games ... disappearance of any real dual vocational training for teachers now condemned to oscillate between repression and depression ... abandon any ambitions for colleges left fallow while many of them are on the verge of explosion ... contemptuous treatment of the movements of Education People and teaching some of which are seriously threatened in their role in supporting the school ...

These measures are presented as "reforms" but I refuse, for my part to call them. First, because it would imply that this the "necessary changes" and that those who oppose it are conservatives. On the other hand, because the dominant ideology and government rhetoric have always these "reforms" as inevitable : "There is no alternative if we want our children to know ... read it ... do not waste our taxes ... we hold our place in the world ... etc.. . In reality, there are always alternatives. And the role of policy is precisely to present scenarios showing the chances and risks they entail, refer them to the purposes intended and available means. A minimum it is for policymakers to involve all partners in the exploration of these scenarios and to involve researchers to illuminate the choice ... But what do we see? Unilateral decisions, rushed, without proper anticipation of their consequences, without any mobilization of civic intelligence. "

hop * And, I bounce on this sentence to encourage and facebookiens Facebookien to join the group for the excellent Mr. Leek "to remind elected officials that they represent us and we do not run ".


(* copyright Nicolas)

The Notorious Jewel And Shelly

applied to feminism

image source

I plan to publish a book. It was called modestly" Women , you are lying! Damage of feminism on the living conditions of household. "Here's the introduction:

" From time immemorial, man has searched its future in its origins. For history is like that: it was before the beginning and the future is not now, but the loss of meaning is there and the end of the world. What to do? While

that the first men did not experience the joy of saying that everything is slipping away, we, the moderns, hold the ability to tap into their ancestral way of life the royal way of the agreement found with ourselves. It's a chance.
An overwhelming responsibility was therefore given to cavemen: adopt exemplary for their offspring in search of landmarks. But everyone's shit. We lost everything we had and now the archaeologists, it is expensive.

Today, if one takes stock of human activity since the beginning, it is clear that it is urgent to get back to basics. Ask around you: the world is it beautiful? Are you happy? You'll see.

Before, people were happy. And for good reason! We taught the kids only useful stuff like a stone carving. We do not know the crime.
Women brick the cave while the men ran the mammoth. Since Simone de Beauvoir and suffragettes have damaged this natural order under the guise of women's liberation, thousands of women are both at the same time to feed their husbands, the coup necessarily unemployed. This is nonsense. And we sink a little more each day! "

Sounds good?

No, I'm not trying to convince me to leave pro-anti-feminist. I try to imitate their prose as apparently they recipe. In

strumming on Facebook, I discovered the existence of a book I do not want to advertise. I spent quite some time to comment on the fine words of the author who never wanted to discuss with me because it was not fair because I was quoting his press releases and it has nothing to do with his book. Bin see. This is the same person who wrote them, but either. The lady blithely slap on feminism and thus exposes the eyes of all its flagrant disregard of the subject. I found it useful to send the definition of Webster but it has trouble. I wanted to comment on its title and some of his sentences. Which you can find below quotes. Excerpts from our conversation: me

- Your subtitle keeps me a bit to read the rest: "to end the feminist", I find it a bit easy and demagogue (who hasten to the reaction of applauding ).
I reject the simplifications that you do not drop:
- "The vast majority of women continue to think with their wombs, they fantasize more readily on a diaper full of shit on a strap-on."
You oppose the taste for a sex toy with the desire for motherhood, as if on one hand, this was inconsistent (I want both I think, or none, any possible correlation), and secondly as if feminism had to do with the sex industry, which like any industry, seeks to create need. (...) We can not blame a social movement of such consequences.

"the specimens were finally freed the body much more efficiently than the suffragettes"
No report. Just a nice formula. In terms of women's rights, voting rights, oh yes, just that we can thank the feminists rather than test tubes. The two do not always opposed to elsewhere ... A
all practical purposes, the definition of feminism by Webster:
"attitude of those who want the rights of women are the same as those of men."
We talk about rights, that's all, nothing to be afraid for either men or women ...

author - I'm talking about my book, and you reply press release - you know what for a press release or not?

Then I tell him that I speak also the title of her book, she will qualify my comments (the ones you read) of "idiots and despicable." I tell him it's not nice, she answered that she had put a smiley. I will spare you this beautiful time.

Say it is I who am stupid or what?

I find that typing on feminism is a bit like blaming the 35 hours of all evils: a fashionable posture and do not eat bread. Afterwards, she certifies that neither the title nor the statements in the press release does not match the content of his book. It will be understood, you have to buy ... I want to read it, but I can not hold in my hands a book entitled "to do away with feminism." I know it's stupid.

How To Hook Up Phone With Time Warner Cable

Diastole / systole

I've been reading the site Department of recovery and finally I think everything is fine. Of I suddenly closes.

Discover Smells!

Kates Playground Iphone Movies

Inattention citizen

"Now when there is a strike, nobody notices!" Sarkozy had said during a national council of the UMP . Las , the number of demonstrators meeting last January 29 have been because of the credibility of our beloved President .

It seems difficult to prevent the latter to distill some nonsense lorsqu'envie takes to give his point views on the working conditions of its people. Stand united: because we can not avoid it makes questionable statements, offer him our most devoted inattention! The association Carla oùj'pense therefore joins in the operation:

Now when Sarkozy speaks, no one notices it!

We will be present at the rally Thursday, Feb. 5 at 20h outside city halls in order to run our president a strong message: courage, we will not care!

Lia Sophia November Invites

chuckles, ladies

chuckles, there will always be some thing. Especially if you're going into a career as first lady of France. Here is what was the final blow given to my brain this morning. As is my habit is driving down the eyelids and feet barely touch the ground as I lit my position rests on a general public radio.

After shocking speech by our current majority on the "dismantling of the 35 hours" (jdis me that ... I just resume the term of the President of the UMP, eh, but it seems it's a ball. It actually meant "not questioning the 35-hour just to be relaxed." expected to know how many hours they have hard cram into one hour flexible), I discovered stunned the perky news last of the day: "Here's a laugh, listen and guess who it comes from."

There I panicked: "Gasp, am I serious fluff, already the game of a thousand dollars!". But no. It was simply the playful who wanted to close the news on a lively note. Tralala. Between the page and retrograde political weather, Ladies and Gentlemen, the riddle of the newspaper! "Mouaaaaarf!" (= First run of the chuckle). A response immediately germinated in my brain, throwing himself decidedly on the first stimulus came: "Carla Bruni Mpffff bin is yours." (Like what I'm easy).

"Did you know?" journalist gleefully insists his case. "Listen carefully:" mouaaaaarf! "Well?" Yep ... it's Laughter Carla Bruni, our first lady of France, captured yesterday morning at Rungis by Jean-Pierre Machinchose. A good day tomorrow! "Mouaaaaarf! ""

Well I say stop there. Besides the fact that it hits severe, the giggling to Carla, I find it a tad inflated that we present this record as if it had just dug up a roll of the Dead Sea.

I know, the fact is not new. Information is the play more and more people parent and thus a false provocation to make us forget what could be a really outspoken critic. But the presenter, obviously amazed, uttered the phrase "first lady of France" as if she was chewing carefully with the oyster produce the pearl hearing it would give us to hear. Let's hear it thinking. "Wonderful, this Carla, decidedly." See how she laughs. How fresh, how sensuality in the wobbly! This little thrill throat is absolutely irresistible. It was Nicolas who is fun ... "

Because I think the bottom of this box is poilade in there. Everything is in what is intended to suggest that the net capture voice giving way to a moment of joy. Being unable to exhibit the technical legs of our first lady and probably regretting not being able to go until we dig up an orgasm in her digitized radio this morning found a way to provide neurons early risers short-circuiting onanism allowing them to sleep too dry, the smile. So, happy?

You just read an old post appeared on my other blog .