image source I plan to publish a book. It was called modestly" Women , you are lying! Damage of feminism on the living conditions of household. "Here's the introduction:
" From time immemorial, man has searched its future in its origins. For history is like that: it was before the beginning and the future is not now, but the loss of meaning is there and the end of the world. What to do? While
that the first men did not experience the joy of saying that everything is slipping away, we, the moderns, hold the ability to tap into their ancestral way of life the royal way of the agreement found with ourselves. It's a chance.
An overwhelming responsibility was therefore given to cavemen: adopt exemplary for their offspring in search of landmarks. But everyone's shit. We lost everything we had and now the archaeologists, it is expensive.
Today, if one takes stock of human activity since the beginning, it is clear that it is urgent to get back to basics. Ask around you: the world is it beautiful? Are you happy? You'll see.
Before, people were happy. And for good reason! We taught the kids only useful stuff like a stone carving. We do not know the crime.
Women brick the cave while the men ran the mammoth. Since Simone de Beauvoir and suffragettes have damaged this natural order under the guise of women's liberation, thousands of women are both at the same time to feed their husbands, the coup necessarily unemployed. This is nonsense. And we sink a little more each day! "
Sounds good?
No, I'm not trying to convince me to leave pro-anti-feminist. I try to imitate their prose as apparently they recipe. In
strumming on Facebook, I discovered the existence of a book I do not want to advertise. I spent quite some time to comment on the fine words of the author who never wanted to discuss with me because it was not fair because I was quoting his press releases and it has nothing to do with his book. Bin see. This is the same person who wrote them, but either. The lady blithely slap on feminism and thus exposes the eyes of all its flagrant disregard of the subject. I found it useful to send the definition of Webster but it has trouble. I wanted to comment on its title and some of his sentences. Which you can find below quotes. Excerpts from our conversation: me
- Your subtitle keeps me a bit to read the rest: "to end the feminist", I find it a bit easy and demagogue (who hasten to the reaction of applauding ).
I reject the simplifications that you do not drop:
- "The vast majority of women continue to think with their wombs, they fantasize more readily on a diaper full of shit on a strap-on."
You oppose the taste for a sex toy with the desire for motherhood, as if on one hand, this was inconsistent (I want both I think, or none, any possible correlation), and secondly as if feminism had to do with the sex industry, which like any industry, seeks to create need. (...) We can not blame a social movement of such consequences.
"the specimens were finally freed the body much more efficiently than the suffragettes"
No report. Just a nice formula. In terms of women's rights, voting rights, oh yes, just that we can thank the feminists rather than test tubes. The two do not always opposed to elsewhere ... A
all practical purposes, the definition of feminism by Webster:
"attitude of those who want the rights of women are the same as those of men."
We talk about rights, that's all, nothing to be afraid for either men or women ...
author - I'm talking about my book, and you reply press release - you know what for a press release or not?
Then I tell him that I speak also the title of her book, she will qualify my comments (the ones you read) of "idiots and despicable." I tell him it's not nice, she answered that she had put a smiley. I will spare you this beautiful time.
Say it is I who am stupid or what?
I find that typing on feminism is a bit like blaming the 35 hours of all evils: a fashionable posture and do not eat bread. Afterwards, she certifies that neither the title nor the statements in the press release does not match the content of his book. It will be understood, you have to buy ... I want to read it, but I can not hold in my hands a book entitled "to do away with feminism." I know it's stupid.
" From time immemorial, man has searched its future in its origins. For history is like that: it was before the beginning and the future is not now, but the loss of meaning is there and the end of the world. What to do? While
that the first men did not experience the joy of saying that everything is slipping away, we, the moderns, hold the ability to tap into their ancestral way of life the royal way of the agreement found with ourselves. It's a chance.
An overwhelming responsibility was therefore given to cavemen: adopt exemplary for their offspring in search of landmarks. But everyone's shit. We lost everything we had and now the archaeologists, it is expensive.
Today, if one takes stock of human activity since the beginning, it is clear that it is urgent to get back to basics. Ask around you: the world is it beautiful? Are you happy? You'll see.
Before, people were happy. And for good reason! We taught the kids only useful stuff like a stone carving. We do not know the crime.
Women brick the cave while the men ran the mammoth. Since Simone de Beauvoir and suffragettes have damaged this natural order under the guise of women's liberation, thousands of women are both at the same time to feed their husbands, the coup necessarily unemployed. This is nonsense. And we sink a little more each day! "
Sounds good?
No, I'm not trying to convince me to leave pro-anti-feminist. I try to imitate their prose as apparently they recipe. In
strumming on Facebook, I discovered the existence of a book I do not want to advertise. I spent quite some time to comment on the fine words of the author who never wanted to discuss with me because it was not fair because I was quoting his press releases and it has nothing to do with his book. Bin see. This is the same person who wrote them, but either. The lady blithely slap on feminism and thus exposes the eyes of all its flagrant disregard of the subject. I found it useful to send the definition of Webster but it has trouble. I wanted to comment on its title and some of his sentences. Which you can find below quotes. Excerpts from our conversation: me
- Your subtitle keeps me a bit to read the rest: "to end the feminist", I find it a bit easy and demagogue (who hasten to the reaction of applauding ).
I reject the simplifications that you do not drop:
- "The vast majority of women continue to think with their wombs, they fantasize more readily on a diaper full of shit on a strap-on."
You oppose the taste for a sex toy with the desire for motherhood, as if on one hand, this was inconsistent (I want both I think, or none, any possible correlation), and secondly as if feminism had to do with the sex industry, which like any industry, seeks to create need. (...) We can not blame a social movement of such consequences.
"the specimens were finally freed the body much more efficiently than the suffragettes"
No report. Just a nice formula. In terms of women's rights, voting rights, oh yes, just that we can thank the feminists rather than test tubes. The two do not always opposed to elsewhere ... A
all practical purposes, the definition of feminism by Webster:
"attitude of those who want the rights of women are the same as those of men."
We talk about rights, that's all, nothing to be afraid for either men or women ...
author - I'm talking about my book, and you reply press release - you know what for a press release or not?
Then I tell him that I speak also the title of her book, she will qualify my comments (the ones you read) of "idiots and despicable." I tell him it's not nice, she answered that she had put a smiley. I will spare you this beautiful time.
Say it is I who am stupid or what?
I find that typing on feminism is a bit like blaming the 35 hours of all evils: a fashionable posture and do not eat bread. Afterwards, she certifies that neither the title nor the statements in the press release does not match the content of his book. It will be understood, you have to buy ... I want to read it, but I can not hold in my hands a book entitled "to do away with feminism." I know it's stupid.
0 comments:
Post a Comment